Green Practices Guideline for Livestock Sector

QUESTIONNAIRE 1. Cost-benefit analysis: This involves comparing the costs of implementing the evaluation method with the potential benefits that it is expected to produce. (a) On a scale of 1-5, how expensive is it to implement this evaluation method? (1 = very inexpensive, 5 = very expensive) (b) On a scale of 1-5, how much of a benefit is this evaluation method expected to produce? (1 = no benefit, 5 = significant benefit) (c) On a scale of 1-5, how likely is it that the benefits of this evaluation method will outweigh the costs? (1 = not likely at all, 5 = extremely likely) (d) On a scale of 1-5, how confident are you that the costs of this evaluation method can be financed? (1 = not confident at all, 5 = extremely confident) (e) On a scale of 1-5, how well does this evaluation method compare to other evaluation methods in terms of cost-benefit ratio? (1 = much worse, 5 = much better) (f) On a scale of 1-5, how much of an impact does this evaluation method have in terms of unintended consequences? (1 = no impact, 5 = significant impact) (g) On a scale of 1-5, how much of an impact does this evaluation method have in terms of long-term costs or benefits? (1 = no impact, 5 = significant impact) (h) On a scale of 1-5, how much of an impact does this evaluation method have in terms of regulatory or legal considerations? (1 = no impact, 5 = significant impact) 2. Feasibility study: This is a comprehensive analysis of the potential risks, challenges and opportunities of the evaluation method, including the resources required and the potential impact on the stakeholders. (a) On a scale of 1-5, how easy is it to implement this evaluationmethod? (1 = very difficult, 5 = very easy) (b) On a scale of 1-5, how well does this evaluation method fit within the available resources and constraints? (1 = not well at all, 5 = extremely well) (c) On a scale of 1-5, how likely is it that this evaluation method will be successful given the available resources and constraints? (1 = not likely at all, 5 = extremely likely) (d) On a scale of 1-5, how much time is required to implement this evaluation method? (1 = very little time, 5 = a significant amount of time) (e) On a scale of 1-5, how well does this evaluation method perform during the pilot testing? (1 = not well at all, 5 = extremely well) (f) On a scale of 1-5, how well does this evaluation method perform in terms of logistics? (1 = not well at all, 5 = extremely well) (g) On a scale of 1-5, how well does this evaluation method perform in terms of data accessibility? (1 = not well at all, 5 = extremely well) (h) On a scale of 1-5, how well does this evaluation method perform in terms of expert review? (1 = not well at all, 5 = extremely well) 126 GREEN PRACTICES GUIDELINE FOR LIVESTOCK SECTOR